Everyday liberal fascism in the EU: the EU’s top court rules that member states must recognise gender identity change
European Union member states must recognise gender reassignment and the associated first name acquired in other countries, the EU’s top court ruled on Friday.
Fascism has always been racially motivated, and this is no different in the European Union, where liberal fascists use gender theory in the same way Hitler did against minorities. I am thinking here of the plan to exterminate the Jews, the theory of the ‘improvement’ of the biological race, eugenics, on the basis of which Mengele carried out his horrific human experiments in the Auschwitz death camp, and which is not far removed from the liberal fascists today.
There is no wonder that the European Union, imitating the United States, of course, it is once again invoking biology as a weapon to keep its political power alive. It all started with the questioning of the role of women in society, the denial of motherhood as such on the basis of individual rights, the denial of the family as such on the basis of the individualist philosophy of liberalism. We have reached the point where the European Union is now imposing numerus calusus to prevent women from assuming the traditional role that nature has given them. Today, men are being restrained on the basis of the numerus clausus, familiar from fascism, in the name of equality, so that we now have four women and only two men out of six vice-presidents of the European Commission, and then there is the President, Ursula von der Leyen, who is also a woman. Even the blind can see the dictatorial coercion at work.
We are now at the point where liberal fascism no longer even wants to distinguish between men and women, it says ” all human beings are born free and equal, without biological constraints, sexuality is nothing more than a role in society, which the individual can assume for himself.” I don’t think you can describe gender-based liberal fascism any better than that.
Linked to this theory is now a ruling by the European Court of Justice that it is contrary to EU law for an EU state to “refuse to recognise and register on the birth certificate of a citizen a change of name and identity lawfully acquired in another Member State…”.
According to the court, refusal of such recognition “constitutes an obstacle to the exercise of the right of free movement and residence” because “the difference in identity resulting from such refusal … causes difficulties for a person” in his or her daily life, including “serious professional, administrative and private inconveniences”.
The latest ruling comes after a Bucharest court asked the EU court for guidance on the case of a man with dual Romanian and British nationality who legally recognised his male gender identity in the UK in 2020, but the Romanian authorities refused to accept his changed sex and refused to issue him with a new birth certificate changing his first name.
In a press conference, Accept, an association defending the rights of LGBTQ people in Romania, which is of course funded by the EU, hailed the decision as “a great victory for transgender people in Romania”, stressing that it was the “first time” that the Supreme Court had ruled on such a case.
Endre Barcs
